Llandudno CYTUN President's Blog
Saturday, 9 December 2017
Sunday, 28 May 2017
Are we Upper Room Christians or Pentecost Christians?
Some years ago,
Mel Gibson made a film called The Passion of Christ. It spared nothing of the blood, guts and
cruelty of the torture and death of Jesus in his last hours.
But of course
that’s only one meaning of passion. Jesus’s
real passion was for the truth, love, peace and justice that characterise the
Kingdom of God, a passion so great that he was willing to suffer death, even
death on the cross rather than compromise the message.
And at the point
of confronting earthly power with the truth, all his followers ran away. James and John who had wanted the seats on
either side of the throne. Even Peter
whose passionate declaration that Jesus was the Messiah proved to be fragile
under pressure. It’s easy to be
passionate when you think you are on the winning side, rather harder when the
chips are down.
The twelve
apostles had two problems, their passion was fragile and they lacked
imagination.
And in this they
were no different to the other religious people of their time. As a downtrodden people paying tithes to the
landowners, taxes to the temple and taxes to the Romans, under the yoke of a
cruel oppressor and only one accident away from the debtors prison, they
yearned for change but the only route to change of which they could conceive
was of a Messiah who rode at the head of a revolution which put the oppressors
to flight.
Riding into town
on a donkey, may have faithfully reflected the biblical prophecy of Malachi but
it didn’t really cut it when the Roman Army was tramping up the other side of
the hill to ensure order at the festival.
The apostles
listened to Jesus’s parables, realised he was something different but couldn’t
quite imagine the Kingdom of God he talked about.
And this why they
spend much of their time after Easter locked in the Upper Room, fearful that
their Galilean accents might betray that they are Jesus’s followers and it is
there they retreat after the Ascension, when Jesus leaves them fort the second
time.
Lest you think
I’m being hard on the apostles, let’s remember that Jesus spent his ministry
teaching amongst a God-fearing people, a people that knew their scriptures,
their foundation stories were steadfast in their Jewish faith and attended
synagogue regularly.
Some of them were
so zealous in their faith that they took pride in ensuring every minor point of
the law was interpreted to the last detail and followed. We know them as the Pharisees.
The problem, as
Jesus pointed out to them on many occasions was not God’s law, but the fact
that they interpreted it and lived it without love. He told them wonderful parables about the
Kingdom of God to show how it should be.
You see the Upper
Room was not just a physical place in Jerusalem but it was a place in people’s
minds. For all the prophesies, for all
the parables, they could just not imagine what a world run and lived in
accordance with God’s love would look like.
We too are
faithful people. We attend church
regularly. Most of us are kind, decent,
polite and believe in fair play and social order and we believe these to be
God’s way. We give modest amounts to charity and contribute to the food
bank. We have transposed our
quintessential British values onto our faith and made them our faith.
But this is not
the Kingdom of God that Jesus came to proclaim.
Do our young
people have visions and our old people dream dreams of what a revolutionary,
radical world lived according to God’s values of truth, love, peace and justice
might look like?
Can we dream as
Martin Luther King did when he proclaimed, “I have a dream that one day this nation will rise up
and live out the true meaning of its creed: "We hold these truths to be
self-evident, that all men are created equal."
What would equal
mean?
Would it mean the
list of sterile tick boxes you have to fill in every time you fill in an
official form or job application?
Would it mean
working out how the wealth of the nation is better shared among its citizens?
Is it enough to
treat decently just the people we know or should we be concerned about those
people we don’t know?
What does
treating people equally mean when those fleeing from war are turned away at our
borders, even when they are children?
Jesus told us
that the whole of the Law could be summed up in loving God and loving our
neighbour. Our country would ensure the
Good Samaritan didn’t even get in the country to upset us with his
revolutionary love.
Can we really dream
of what a world where people were treated equally would look like?
After a shocking
tragedy in Manchester this week, people laid aside divisions. Muslims knelt beside Jews and Christians and
those of no faith. Taxi drivers of many
ethnic backgrounds offered concertgoers a free lift home. They acted like neighbours. The challenge is
whether we can continue to act like neighbours without a tragedy.
I’m sure that everyone
here tells the truth but are you willing to speak truth to power. Have you even written to your MP to ask why,
in sixth richest nation in the world, we need food banks or to the county
councillor to ask why we have increasing numbers of people sleeping on our
streets?
Can we have a
vision of what our country would look like if poverty were eliminated and what
sacrifices we would be willing to make to ensure that happens?
We have the most
prosperous retired generation in history while our young people are burdened by
debt, a home of their own only a faint glimmer for many.
When Pilate
worried whether Jesus was claiming to be a king, Jesus said, “For this I
was born, and for this I came into the world, to testify to the truth.
Are we willing to testify to the truth and campaign for it.
Is keeping the law sufficient for there to be justice? What about the prisoners of conscience that Amnesty
International works to support?
Or the campaigns to protect our environment? Are we for the quiet life or should we be
doing more to ensure that there is a world fit for our grandchildren to
inherit?
Can we imagine
what a society where we respected God’s creation might look like and what
changes in our lifestyle that might mean?
Is peace just an
absence of conflict and good social order?
How do we feel about our nation being one of the biggest arms exporters
in the world?
Can we dream, as
those who founded the United Nations in 1945 did, of a world at peace where our
differences are settled in conference chamber?
Are we willing to be poorer as a consequence of the reduced arms sales?
Over the next couple
of weeks, you will bombarded in the media and through the letter box by
politicians selling their wares in a general election which I suspect few of us
wanted and in which most of us will vote without great enthusiasm.
But it gives us
the chance to speak truth to power.
But please start
with the Gospel not the Daily Mail and before you vote, ask whose manifesto
reflects an understanding of “who is my neighbour?”, whose manifesto leads in
the direction of the non-violent peace which Jesus proclaimed, whose manifesto
reflects the principle of Jubilee that the sharing of the wealth of a society
needs to be rebalanced from time to time, at this time perhaps between the old
and young.
If we Christians
were to dare to be passionate and live and voice the revolutionary gospel of
Jesus Christ, to have visions and to dream dreams, to imagine what a world
would look like coloured with God’s values, we might just change the world.
We would be
changed from Upper Room Christians to Pentecost Christians.
Does that scare
you or enthuse you?
Sunday, 23 April 2017
From the Upper Room to Pentecost
Some years ago,
Mel Gibson made a film called The Passion of Christ. It spared nothing of the blood, guts and
cruelty of the torture and death of Jesus in his last hours.
But of course
that’s only one meaning of passion. Jesus’s
real passion was for the truth, love, peace and justice that characterise the
Kingdom of God, a passion so great that he was willing to suffer death, even
death on the cross rather than compromise the message.
And at the point
of confronting earthly power with the truth, all his followers ran away. James and John who had wanted the seats on
either side of the throne. Even Peter
whose passionate declaration that Jesus was the Messiah proved to be fragile
under pressure.
It’s easy to be
passionate when you think you are on the winning side, rather harder when the
chips are down.
The twelve
apostles had two problems, their passion was fragile and they lacked
imagination.
And in this they
were no different to the other religious people of their time. As a downtrodden people paying tithes to the
landowners, taxes to the temple and taxes to the Romans, under the yoke of a
cruel oppressor and only one accident away from the debtors prison, they
yearned for change but the only route to change of which they could conceive
was of a Messiah who rode at the head of a revolution which put the oppressors
to flight.
Riding into town
on a donkey, may have faithfully reflected the biblical prophecy of Malachi but
it didn’t really cut it when the Roman Army was tramping up the other side of
the hill to ensure order at the festival.
The apostles
listened to Jesus’s parables, realised he was something different but couldn’t
quite imagine the Kingdom of God he talked about.
And this why they
locked themselves in the Upper Room, fearful that their Galilean accents might betray
that they are Jesus’s followers.
Let’s remember that Jesus spent his ministry
teaching amongst a God-fearing people, a people that knew their scriptures,
their foundation stories were steadfast in their Jewish faith and attended
synagogue regularly.
Some of them were
so zealous in their faith that they took pride in ensuring every minor point of
the law was interpreted to the last detail and followed. We know them as the Pharisees.
The problem, as
Jesus pointed out to them on many occasions was not God’s law, but the fact
that they interpreted it and lived it without love. He told them wonderful parables about the
Kingdom of God to show how it should be.
The Upper
Room was not just a physical place in Jerusalem but it was, and is, a place in people’s
minds. For all the prophesies, for all
the parables, the apostles could just not imagine what a world run and lived in
accordance with God’s love would look like.
We too are
faithful people. We attend church
regularly. Most of us are kind, decent,
polite and believe in fair play and social order and we believe these to be
God’s way. We give modest amounts to charity and contribute to the food
bank. We have transposed our
quintessential British values onto our faith and made them our faith.
But this is not
the Kingdom of God that Jesus came to proclaim.
Do our young
people have visions and our old people dream dreams of what a revolutionary,
radical world lived according to God’s values of truth, love, peace and justice
might look like?
Can we dream as
Martin Luther King did when he proclaimed, “I have a dream that one day this nation will rise up
and live out the true meaning of its creed: "We hold these truths to be
self-evident, that all men are created equal."
What would equal
mean?
Would it mean the
list of sterile tick boxes you have to fill in every time you fill in an
official form or job application?
Would it mean
working out how the wealth of the nation is better shared among its citizens?
Is it enough to
treat decently just the people we know or should we be concerned about those
people we don’t know?
What does
treating people equally mean when those fleeing from war are turned away at our
borders, even when they are children?
Jesus told us
that the whole of the Law could be summed up in loving God and loving our
neighbour. Our country would ensure the
Good Samaritan didn’t even get in the country to upset us with his
revolutionary love.
Can we really dream
of what a world where people were treated equally would look like?
I’m sure that everyone
here tells the truth but are you willing to speak truth to power. Have you even written to your MP to ask why,
in sixth richest nation in the world, we need food banks or to the county
councillor to ask why we have increasing numbers of people sleeping on our
streets?
Can we have a
vision of what our country would look like if poverty were eliminated and what
sacrifices we would be willing to make to ensure that happens?
When Pilate
worried whether Jesus was claiming to be a king, Jesus said, “For this I
was born, and for this I came into the world, to testify to the truth.
Is keeping the law sufficient for there to be justice? What about the prisoners of conscience that
Amnesty International works to support?
Or the campaigns to protect our environment? Are we for the quiet life or should we be
doing more to ensure that there is a world fit for our grandchildren to
inherit?
Can we imagine
what a society where we respected God’s creation might look like and what
changes in our lifestyle that might mean?
Is peace just an
absence of conflict and good social order?
How do we feel about our nation being one of the biggest arms exporters
in the world?
Can we dream, as
those who founded the United Nations in 1945 did, of a world at peace where our
differences are settled in conference chamber?
Are we willing to be poorer as a consequence of the reduced arms sales?
Over the next few
weeks, we will bombarded in the media and through the letter box by
politicians selling their wares in a general election which I suspect few of us
wanted and in which most of us will vote without great enthusiasm.
But it gives us
the chance to speak truth to power.
If we Christians
were to dare to be passionate and live and voice the revolutionary gospel of
Jesus Christ, to have visions and to dream dreams, to imagine what a world
would look like coloured with God’s values, we might just change the
world.
We would be
changed from Upper Room Christians to Pentecost Christians.
Does that scare
you or enthuse you?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)